H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Geoff Masters H2H: 2-1

Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over Geoff Masters in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Italian Open round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Geoff Masters
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #29 6-1 6-3 Geoff Masters #63 Match data May 22, 1980* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Tomas Smid #31 7-6 6-1 Geoff Masters #68 Match data Feb 28, 1980* R32 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Geoff Masters #55 6-1 6-4 Tomas Smid Match data Feb 17, 1977* R32 San Jose ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Geoff Masters #826 #42 0 1,889 237 253 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Geoff Masters
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 2–2 50.0% — 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1969 7–6 53.8% — 1,542 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,581 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1971 19–22 46.3% — 1,573 0 0
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1972 18–18 50.0% — 1,670 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1973 28–23 54.9% #52 1,756 0 0
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1974 23–21 52.3% #53 1,766 0 1
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1975 27–24 52.9% #44 1,812 0 1
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1976 27–31 46.6% #53 1,780 0 2
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1977 22–27 44.9% #83 1,662 0 2
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 1978 20–20 50.0% #59 1,701 0 2
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 1979 21–23 47.7% #62 1,728 0 2
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 1980 13–28 31.7% #166 1,517 0 2
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,501 0 2
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Geoff Masters
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1971 3 9 12 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — —
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1973 8 4 12 66.7% 15 13 28 53.6% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — —
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1974 2 8 10 20.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1975 9 9 18 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1976 11 6 17 64.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 11 18 38.9%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1977 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1978 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1980 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 8 9 17 47.1%
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1981 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 70 67 137 51.1% 63 64 127 49.6% 67 67 134 50.0% 37 55 92 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Geoff Masters
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1511 104.2 — — — — — — +30 54.5% +0.45 — — — +0.07
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1542 108.7 — — — — — +20 -1 53.1% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +1.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1581 113.8 — — — — — +4 +1 48.9% +0.09 2–0 0–1 — +2.04
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1971 1573 113.6 — — — — -110 +36 +80 44.4% -0.32 9–3 (75%) 1–3 (25%) — +2.45
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1972 1670 122.7 — — — — -2 -18 -123 48.0% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.43
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1973 1756 140.1 — — — — 0 -38 -146 52.2% +0.18 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.32
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1974 1766 141.0 — — — — -125 +49 -11 52.2% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) — -2.52
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1975 1812 148.9 — — — — -23 -36 +8 53.0% +0.27 10–12 (45%) 6–8 (43%) — -3.09
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1976 1781 148.0 — — — — +86 -91 -12 48.5% +0.04 4–8 (33%) 9–4 (69%) — -2.30
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1977 1662 120.4 — — — — +90 — -42 44.1% -0.40 8–10 (44%) 6–9 (40%) — +2.97
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 1978 1701 140.0 — — — — +47 -24 -35 51.0% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.79
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 1979 1729 143.8 — — — — -31 -3 -1 48.1% -0.11 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.12
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 1980 1518 124.9 — — — — +79 +146 +101 36.6% -0.87 4–8 (33%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.05
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 1981 1501 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1890 139.6 — — — — +20 -4 -11 48.2% -0.04 77–78 (50%) 57–64 (47%) 99.9 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.