H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Gianni Ocleppo H2H: 3-1
Tomas Smid holds a 3–1 lead over Gianni Ocleppo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 69
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1983* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-1 | Gianni Ocleppo | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1981* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-3 7-5 | Gianni Ocleppo | Match data |
| Nov 20, 1980* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-4 | Gianni Ocleppo | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1979* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Gianni Ocleppo | 6-4 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Gianni Ocleppo | #955 | #30 | 0 | 1,806 | 98 | 123 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Gianni Ocleppo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #212 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #108 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #94 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #79 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #72 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #47 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |