H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Henrik Sundstrom H2H: 1-2

Henrik Sundstrom holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Henrik Sundstrom leads 2–0 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Henrik Sundstrom won the 1984 Hamburg Open round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Henrik Sundstrom
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Henrik Sundstrom #16 6-3 6-4 Tomas Smid #14 Match data May 11, 1984* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #17 6-0 6-4 Henrik Sundstrom #31 Match data Mar 10, 1984* QF Brussels ATP 250 Carpet
Henrik Sundstrom 4-6 6-4 7-5 Tomas Smid #27 Match data Jul 23, 1982* R16 Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Henrik Sundstrom #1,070 #6 1 1,993 143 106 57.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Henrik Sundstrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 14–10 58.3% #84 1,601 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1983 31–18 63.3% #23 1,760 0 1
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1984 46–20 69.7% #7 1,843 0 4
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1985 26–18 59.1% #22 1,742 0 4
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1986 21–19 52.5% #77 1,710 0 5
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1987 5–13 27.8% #210 1,619 0 5
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1988 0–2 0.0% #642 1,567 0 5
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,554 0 5
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Henrik Sundstrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 39 10 49 79.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 22 9 31 71.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 21 13 34 61.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 11 21 32 34.4% 122 63 185 65.9% 5 11 16 31.2% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Henrik Sundstrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1474 123.5 — — — — — +31 — 23.1% -2.15 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.51
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1602 127.8 — — — — -23 +69 -105 56.7% +0.63 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) — +2.45
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1760 155.0 — — — — -150 +129 -196 58.3% +0.43 11–4 (73%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.36
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1984 1843 157.2 — — — — -184 +159 — 66.1% +0.85 9–8 (53%) 13–4 (76%) — -0.43
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1985 1742 147.0 — — — — -128 +208 — 55.5% +0.54 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) — -1.57
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1986 1711 139.4 — — — — -166 +152 — 50.0% +0.04 6–5 (55%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.61
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1987 1619 118.5 — — — — — +83 — 35.4% -1.23 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.64
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1988 1567 94.8 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.34
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1989 1554 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1993 151.5 — — — — -141 +144 -160 55.4% +0.31 39–30 (57%) 32–27 (54%) 103.8 -1.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.