H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 4-2

Tomas Smid holds a 4–2 lead over Joakim Nystrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay, while Joakim Nystrom leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1987 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Joakim Nystrom
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joakim Nystrom #16 6-3 6-1 6-4 Tomas Smid #60 Match data Jun 26, 1987* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Joakim Nystrom #43 4-6 7-5 6-3 Tomas Smid #17 Match data Dec 16, 1983* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Grass
Tomas Smid #22 6-0 6-3 4-6 2-6 7-5 Joakim Nystrom Match data May 22, 1983* F Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #25 6-1 6-4 Joakim Nystrom Match data Nov 9, 1982* R32 Toulouse ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #27 6-1 6-1 Joakim Nystrom #79 Match data Mar 16, 1982* R32 ABN AMRO Open ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Smid #27 6-1 6-0 Joakim Nystrom #95 Match data Sep 26, 1981* SF Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Joakim Nystrom #977 #7 54 2,121 257 136 65.4% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Joakim Nystrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% #440 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1981 13–12 52.0% #69 1,645 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1982 9–14 39.1% #98 1,617 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1983 26–12 68.4% #27 1,867 0 1
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1984 56–20 73.7% #11 1,969 0 5
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1985 50–21 70.4% #11 1,943 0 7
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1986 55–17 76.4% #7 1,926 0 12
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1987 33–16 67.3% #16 1,879 0 13
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1988 13–15 46.4% #69 1,730 0 13
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1989 2–8 20.0% #331 1,607 0 13
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Joakim Nystrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 20 4 24 83.3% 30 10 40 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1985 14 6 20 70.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 15 3 18 83.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 60 31 91 65.9% 138 70 208 66.3% 23 12 35 65.7% 36 23 59 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Joakim Nystrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1492 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.05
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1645 133.9 — — — — -78 +23 -103 46.8% -0.24 5–1 (83%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.49
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1618 133.1 — — — — -103 +115 — 43.5% -0.32 2–4 (33%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.22
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1983 1868 149.9 — — — — -235 -70 -111 63.6% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.17
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1984 1969 153.9 — — — — -39 -15 -234 65.1% +0.98 19–4 (83%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.15
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1985 1943 156.7 — — — — +8 +26 -150 65.8% +1.19 12–9 (57%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.33
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1986 1926 163.8 — — — — +108 +4 -113 70.2% +1.58 13–7 (65%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.15
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1987 1880 153.1 — — — — -25 +138 -78 62.8% +0.97 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.40
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1988 1730 133.0 — — — — +3 +142 +66 47.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.25
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1989 1608 95.3 — — — — +49 +152 — 30.8% -1.92 1–3 (25%) — — +0.53
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 2121 156.2 — — — — +2 +44 -117 60.9% +0.82 76–41 (65%) 57–41 (58%) 108.6 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.