H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs John Lloyd H2H: 2-1

Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over John Lloyd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, John Lloyd won the 1985 Australian Open round of 64 7-5 6-7 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
John Lloyd
GBR Age 72 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Lloyd 7-5 6-7 7-6 6-3 Tomas Smid #18 Match data Nov 29, 1985* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Tomas Smid #31 6-3 6-1 John Lloyd Match data May 12, 1982* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid 6-0 6-3 John Lloyd Match data Mar 22, 1979* R32 New Orleans ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
John Lloyd — — — 1,885 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid John Lloyd
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid John Lloyd
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 3 5 40.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1975 1 2 3 33.3% 8 13 21 38.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1977 9 8 17 52.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1978 3 6 9 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1981 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1985 11 9 20 55.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 57 60 117 48.7% 43 70 113 38.1% 45 50 95 47.4% 28 48 76 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid John Lloyd
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1487 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1512 113.9 — — — — +71 +36 -13 41.8% -0.78 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — +1.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1608 123.1 — — — — -25 -131 +66 44.3% -0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.47
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1975 1629 131.7 — — — — -42 -59 +41 41.6% -0.66 5–11 (31%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.19
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1976 1698 138.2 — — — — -12 -113 -42 46.0% -0.44 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.63
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1977 1833 144.8 — — — — -6 -264 -67 51.1% -0.04 5–12 (29%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.14
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1978 1746 143.7 — — — — +22 -97 +34 46.9% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 5–1 (83%) — -2.65
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1979 1685 130.7 — — — — -7 +23 +19 41.6% -0.61 4–7 (36%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.99
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1980 1602 103.2 — — — — -2 +80 +77 17.4% -2.74 — — — -0.08
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1981 1683 129.2 — — — — -34 — +12 40.5% -0.84 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.96
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 1982 1604 124.7 — — — — +20 +102 -8 39.3% -0.92 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.59
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 1983 1681 132.2 — — — — +12 -22 -15 49.2% +0.16 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.42
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 1984 1785 137.8 — — — — +44 -113 -176 50.0% -0.08 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.67
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 1985 1823 140.0 — — — — -53 -163 -75 52.3% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.54
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 1986 1723 128.9 — — — — +31 -84 — 41.9% -0.68 0–1 0–1 — -1.47
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1886 141.0 — — — — -4 -82 -13 45.3% -0.43 56–69 (45%) 60–54 (53%) 103.6 -2.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.