H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs John Sadri H2H: 2-3
John Sadri holds a 3–2 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, John Sadri leads 3–2 on carpet. Most recently, John Sadri won the 1985 Atlanta third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1985* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | John Sadri | 6-3 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-3 | John Sadri | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1982* | Mexico City Wct | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 3-6 7-6 4-6 7-6 6-2 | John Sadri | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1981* | Monterrey Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | John Sadri | 7-6 6-7 6-2 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1980* | Washington (2) | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | John Sadri | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| John Sadri | #997 | #14 | 0 | 1,976 | 214 | 189 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | John Sadri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #45 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #38 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #130 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |