H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 1-0
Tomas Smid holds a 1–0 lead over Ken Rosewall in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1978 Monte Carlo Wct third round 3-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1978* | Monte Carlo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Ken Rosewall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |