H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Kent Carlsson H2H: 1-2

Kent Carlsson holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kent Carlsson leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Kent Carlsson won the 1986 Barcelona Open semifinal 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Kent Carlsson
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kent Carlsson #20 7-6 6-2 Tomas Smid #64 Match data Sep 27, 1986* SF Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Kent Carlsson #63 6-3 6-1 Tomas Smid #16 Match data Sep 26, 1985* R32 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #12 6-1 4-6 6-4 Kent Carlsson #234 Match data Jul 28, 1984* QF Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kent Carlsson #625 #6 60 2,106 155 57 73.1% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Kent Carlsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1984 7–8 46.7% #138 1,583 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 17–12 58.6% #50 1,673 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 43–13 76.8% #13 1,905 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1987 35–9 79.5% #12 1,994 0 4
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1988 48–8 85.7% #6 2,086 0 9
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1989 5–6 45.5% #309 1,924 0 9
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Kent Carlsson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 38 10 48 79.2% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 33 8 41 80.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 — — — — 48 8 56 85.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 7 6 13 53.8% 148 51 199 74.4% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Kent Carlsson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1496 106.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.15
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1584 137.8 — — — — — +31 — 51.3% +0.36 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1673 137.3 — — — — — +52 — 56.7% +0.84 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.52
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1906 160.4 — — — — -310 +91 — 73.1% +1.93 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.31
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1995 165.0 — — — — -367 +78 — 77.8% +2.20 9–3 (75%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.64
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1988 2087 164.2 — — — — — +87 — 82.2% +2.57 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.02
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1989 1924 110.7 — — — — — +77 — 44.4% -0.37 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.36
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 2107 161.5 — — — — -326 +77 — 70.6% +1.73 29–20 (59%) 19–17 (53%) 101.6 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.