H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Mark Cox H2H: 2-0
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Stuttgart Indoor final 6-1 6-3 5-7 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1980* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-3 5-7 1-6 6-4 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1979* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-1 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Mark Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 |