H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Michael Westphal H2H: 3-1

Tomas Smid holds a 3–1 lead over Michael Westphal in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Michael Westphal leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Westphal won the 1986 Memphis round of 32 7-6 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Michael Westphal
GER Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Westphal #57 7-6 4-6 7-6 Tomas Smid #17 Match data Feb 6, 1986* R32 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Tomas Smid #14 6-1 7-6 Michael Westphal Match data May 10, 1984* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #25 3-6 6-1 6-4 Michael Westphal Match data Nov 11, 1982* SF Toulouse ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #24 6-3 6-1 Michael Westphal Match data Oct 28, 1982* R32 Cologne ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Michael Westphal #1,050 #49 81 1,755 73 97 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Michael Westphal
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 4–6 40.0% — 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 7–9 43.8% #96 1,569 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 19–14 57.6% #73 1,712 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1985 15–16 48.4% #51 1,702 0 0
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1986 12–21 36.4% #101 1,642 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1987 5–15 25.0% #279 1,566 0 0
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1988 6–9 40.0% #116 1,554 0 0
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1989 5–7 41.7% #233 1,566 0 0
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Michael Westphal
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 7 17 58.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 7 7 14 50.0% 2 11 13 15.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1987 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 31 41 72 43.1% 36 45 81 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 8 13 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Michael Westphal
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1557 126.4 — — — — +47 — — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1570 120.2 — — — — -2 -3 — 48.8% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.83
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1712 143.7 — — — — -22 -44 — 56.6% +0.41 4–5 (44%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.25
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1985 1703 130.1 — — — — -43 -9 — 46.8% -0.66 8–6 (57%) 9–4 (69%) — -1.63
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1986 1642 120.8 — — — — +20 -45 — 37.8% -0.96 6–5 (55%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.25
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1987 1566 126.7 — — — — +46 +3 — 32.7% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.24
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1988 1554 114.4 — — — — +23 +43 — 38.2% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.39
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1989 1566 117.9 — — — — -15 +56 — 40.6% -0.25 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.38
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1755 134.6 — — — — +6 -8 — 44.3% -0.46 30–32 (48%) 31–31 (50%) 100.8 -1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.