H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Nick Saviano H2H: 2-1

Tomas Smid holds a 2–1 lead over Nick Saviano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1982 Stockholm Open round of 32 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nick Saviano
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #26 6-3 1-6 6-3 Nick Saviano #74 Match data Nov 4, 1982* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Nick Saviano #85 7-5 6-1 Tomas Smid #28 Match data Nov 1, 1980* SF Cologne ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #68 7-6 0-6 7-5 Nick Saviano #58 Match data Feb 4, 1978* F Sarasota ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Nick Saviano #736 #48 0 1,791 158 199 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Nick Saviano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 1–3 25.0% #220 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 2–6 25.0% #179 1,473 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1976 7–12 36.8% #115 1,501 0 0
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1977 13–18 41.9% #60 1,646 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1978 32–32 50.0% #72 1,689 0 0
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1979 24–26 48.0% #72 1,780 0 0
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1980 19–24 44.2% #93 1,751 0 0
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1981 26–28 48.1% #97 1,694 0 0
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1982 14–27 34.1% #99 1,645 0 0
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 1983 20–21 48.8% #97 1,624 0 1
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 1984 0–1 0.0% #745 1,609 0 1
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Nick Saviano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 13 13 26 50.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1979 13 12 25 52.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1980 10 13 23 43.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 6 6 0.0%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1981 17 15 32 53.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1982 6 12 18 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1983 15 12 27 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 70 80 150 46.7% 25 39 64 39.1% 28 30 58 48.3% 35 50 85 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Nick Saviano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1492 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1481 104.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1473 104.9 — — — — +18 +79 — 36.4% -0.82 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.67
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1976 1501 114.5 — — — — +3 +4 — 39.1% -0.30 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) — +1.40
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1977 1646 132.7 — — — — +3 -152 -115 44.9% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.44
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1978 1690 139.8 — — — — -95 -22 -18 51.0% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–10 (50%) — +2.15
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1979 1781 139.0 — — — — -24 -130 -115 47.5% -0.25 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — -2.47
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1980 1751 138.2 — — — — -71 -102 +48 45.6% -0.13 7–7 (50%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.67
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1981 1694 136.6 — — — — +35 -25 +4 47.3% -0.38 10–8 (56%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.21
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1982 1646 141.7 — — — — +41 -13 +48 38.5% -0.97 5–8 (38%) 11–3 (79%) — -3.56
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 1983 1624 119.1 — — — — +44 -50 +58 46.5% -0.25 9–4 (69%) 8–5 (62%) — +2.00
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 1984 1610 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.06
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1791 138.8 — — — — -9 -38 -17 45.3% -0.35 57–64 (47%) 63–60 (51%) 103.8 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.