H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Paolo Bertolucci H2H: 1-2
Paolo Bertolucci holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paolo Bertolucci leads 2–0 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Bologna final 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1980* | Bologna | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 7-5 6-2 | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
| May 24, 1979* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 6-4 5-7 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Oct 14, 1978* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 6-2 6-1 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Paolo Bertolucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |