H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-1
Tomas Smid and Patrick Proisy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Stuttgart Indoor quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1980* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Tomas Smid | 7-5 7-5 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| Apr 22, 1978* | Nice | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Patrick Proisy | 6-1 6-3 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Patrick Proisy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |