H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Patrick Proisy H2H: 1-1

Tomas Smid and Patrick Proisy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1980 Stuttgart Indoor quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Patrick Proisy
FRA Age 76 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #30 7-5 7-5 Patrick Proisy #100 Match data Mar 15, 1980* QF Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Patrick Proisy #48 6-1 6-3 Tomas Smid #30 Match data Apr 22, 1978* QF Nice ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Patrick Proisy #232 #23 0 1,876 222 196 53.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Patrick Proisy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1968 1–4 20.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1969 8–9 47.1% — 1,503 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1971 27–18 60.0% — 1,719 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1972 36–21 63.2% — 1,727 0 0
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1973 32–22 59.3% #41 1,770 0 0
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1974 15–22 40.5% #69 1,670 0 0
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1975 24–17 58.5% #43 1,764 0 0
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1976 14–15 48.3% #104 1,679 0 0
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 1977 25–18 58.1% #44 1,772 0 1
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 1978 12–12 50.0% #96 1,730 0 1
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 1979 14–13 51.9% #93 1,684 0 1
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 1980 11–16 40.7% #158 1,621 0 1
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,565 0 1
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Patrick Proisy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1973 1 3 4 25.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 24 15 39 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 24 17 41 58.5% — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1980 4 2 6 66.7% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 23 28 51 45.1% 164 129 293 56.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Patrick Proisy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1455 96.4 — — — — — — — 10.0% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1504 114.5 — — — — — +51 +6 48.7% -0.13 0–4 (0%) — — -0.31
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1970 1475 103.1 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.56 — — — -0.27
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1971 1719 138.7 — — — — -176 +66 -189 59.2% +0.70 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.87
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1972 1727 135.4 — — — — -76 +206 -140 61.0% +0.94 9–8 (53%) 5–9 (36%) — +2.17
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1973 1771 139.5 — — — — -85 +42 +8 59.9% +0.50 3–9 (25%) 10–4 (71%) — +1.32
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1974 1670 129.2 — — — — -15 +62 +71 46.2% -0.18 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.86
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1975 1765 142.4 — — — — — +60 — 53.3% +0.49 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.52
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1976 1680 132.0 — — — — — +32 0 50.0% +0.28 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.81
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 1977 1773 134.5 — — — — — +9 — 55.4% +0.44 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) — +2.04
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 1978 1730 128.5 — — — — -120 +32 — 53.3% +0.15 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.58
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 1979 1685 129.7 — — — — -133 +67 — 57.1% +0.32 0–7 (0%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.95
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 1980 1622 131.3 — — — — -2 +9 — 43.1% +0.03 6–6 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.51
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 1981 1565 102.1 — — — — — +27 — 31.6% -1.42 0–1 2–0 — +1.38
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1877 139.3 — — — — -67 +55 -71 53.6% +0.33 48–71 (40%) 42–42 (50%) 92.8 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.