H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Ramiro Benavides H2H: 2-0
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Ramiro Benavides in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1979 Barcelona third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BOL
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1979* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-4 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1978* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-2 | Ramiro Benavides | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Ramiro Benavides | #1,003 | #124 | 0 | 1,563 | 44 | 108 | 28.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Ramiro Benavides | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #210 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #153 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #164 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #173 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #173 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |