Tomas Smid
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | 3 | 8 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jan 19, 1986 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 0 | 10 | 10 | Feb 6, 1987 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 1 | 9 | 10 | Aug 31, 1985 | H2H |
| Balazs Taroczy | 5 | 4 | 9 | Aug 8, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Rick Fagel H2H: 2-0
Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Rick Fagel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1979 Berlin round of 32 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | 6-2 6-2 | Rick Fagel | Match data | Jun 21, 1979* | R32 | Berlin | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Tomas Smid | 6-3 6-2 | Rick Fagel | Match data | Oct 27, 1977* | R32 | Vienna Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,994 | 490 | 317 | 60.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Rick Fagel | #759 | #60 | 0 | 1,615 | 47 | 99 | 32.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Rick Fagel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #28 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #113 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #135 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #99 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,730 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,657 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,536 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Rick Fagel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1978 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 33 | 12 | 45 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 1977 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1980 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 25 | 1981 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 23 | 11 | 34 | 67.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1979 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 16 | 21 | 23.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1982 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 24 | 11 | 35 | 68.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 1980 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1983 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 36 | 12 | 48 | 75.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1981 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1985 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 111 | 71 | 182 | 61.0% | 247 | 135 | 382 | 64.7% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 115 | 96 | 211 | 54.5% | — | 9 | 19 | 28 | 32.1% | 37 | 69 | 106 | 34.9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Rick Fagel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 1490 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 20 | 1976 | 1542 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +68 | — | 51.6% | +0.16 | 0–5 (0%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.4 | +0.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 1639 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -104 | +44 | -135 | 51.3% | +0.20 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–6 (25%) | 92.3 | +1.24 | 1975 | 1481 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 22 | 1978 | 1799 | 150.6 | — | — | — | — | -122 | +63 | — | 54.8% | +0.44 | 11–8 (58%) | 8–7 (53%) | 105.4 | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1979 | 1871 | 159.1 | — | — | — | — | -70 | +110 | — | 63.8% | +0.89 | 7–7 (50%) | 12–6 (67%) | 104.6 | -1.69 | 1977 | 1527 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | -35 | +49 | — | 42.3% | -0.58 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.2 | +0.64 |
| 24 | 1980 | 1923 | 155.5 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +3 | — | 65.7% | +0.98 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.9 | -2.22 | 1978 | 1566 | 131.2 | — | — | — | — | -73 | +52 | — | 39.4% | -0.76 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.3 | +1.23 |
| 25 | 1981 | 1854 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +62 | — | 60.1% | +0.90 | 11–6 (65%) | 15–9 (63%) | 104.7 | -1.40 | 1979 | 1512 | 123.8 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +13 | — | 31.8% | -1.24 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.8 | -1.38 |
| 26 | 1982 | 1894 | 156.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +3 | -326 | 63.8% | +1.01 | 16–10 (62%) | 14–11 (56%) | 102.8 | -0.62 | 1980 | 1553 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +9 | — | 40.4% | -0.47 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–4 (33%) | 99.5 | +0.01 |
| 27 | 1983 | 1903 | 155.6 | — | — | — | — | -53 | +56 | -203 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–9 (57%) | 6–10 (38%) | 94.2 | -2.90 | 1981 | 1583 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -8 | — | 37.8% | -0.85 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 104.0 | -1.02 |
| 28 | 1984 | 1841 | 154.8 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -25 | -66 | 59.9% | +0.58 | 10–7 (59%) | 10–11 (48%) | 97.7 | -1.32 | 1982 | 1456 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | +50 | +72 | — | 13.0% | -3.13 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.72 |
| 29 | 1985 | 1805 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | +56 | +68 | -70 | 59.1% | +0.51 | 14–6 (70%) | 13–8 (62%) | 103.3 | +1.83 | 1983 | 1446 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.10 |
| 30 | 1986 | 1724 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +71 | +37 | 52.3% | +0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 6–15 (29%) | 93.3 | +1.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 1731 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +83 | — | 53.2% | +0.07 | 7–10 (41%) | 16–9 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 1657 | 139.2 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +87 | — | 41.8% | -0.36 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–7 (36%) | 100.6 | -2.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 1537 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | 25.9% | -1.52 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.0 | +0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1994 | 155.1 | — | — | — | — | -3 | +56 | -137 | 58.0% | +0.58 | 114–94 (55%) | 114–108 (51%) | 99.2 | -0.82 | — | 1616 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +25 | — | 36.1% | -0.97 | 16–28 (36%) | 11–19 (37%) | 96.9 | +0.24 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Rick Fagel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 14, 1982 | H2H |
| Eddie Dibbs | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 10, 1981 | H2H |
| Peter Feigl | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 19, 1981 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 5, 1981 | H2H |
| Carlos Kirmayr | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |