H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Shlomo Glickstein H2H: 1-2
Shlomo Glickstein holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Shlomo Glickstein leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Milan fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 68
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1983* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 6-1 6-2 | Shlomo Glickstein | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1983* | Munich Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Shlomo Glickstein | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1981* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Shlomo Glickstein | 7-6 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Shlomo Glickstein | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,864 | 159 | 147 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Shlomo Glickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #167 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |