H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tomas Smid vs Van Winitsky H2H: 0-1

Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1978 Miami Open round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Van Winitsky
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Van Winitsky 4-6 6-3 6-2 Tomas Smid #49 Match data Mar 2, 1978* R32 Miami Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Van Winitsky #834 #35 0 1,855 106 133 44.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Smid Van Winitsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% #282 1,505 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% #239 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 8–7 53.3% #228 1,649 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1978 15–25 37.5% #132 1,591 0 0
20 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0 1979 6–14 30.0% #141 1,580 0 0
21 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0 1980 14–17 45.2% #90 1,678 0 0
22 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1 1981 16–12 57.1% #47 1,719 0 1
23 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2 1982 28–23 54.9% #53 1,699 0 3
24 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4 1983 10–17 37.0% #91 1,647 0 3
25 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4 1984 7–14 33.3% #133 1,565 0 3
26 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6 1985 0–1 0.0% #331 1,552 0 3
27 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8 — — — — — — —
28 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8 — — — — — — —
29 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Smid Van Winitsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
20 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%
24 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 1983 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5% — 35 38 73 47.9% 48 57 105 45.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 21 28 49 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Smid Van Winitsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1506 94.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.48
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1527 111.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.71 — — — -0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1650 135.8 — — — — -35 -21 — 51.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1592 127.5 — — — — +61 -13 -54 42.2% -0.64 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) — +2.52
20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89 1979 1581 134.0 — — — — +71 -23 — 28.3% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.14
21 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24 1980 1678 132.8 — — — — -26 -25 — 47.7% -0.09 6–8 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.39
22 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34 1981 1720 130.7 — — — — -6 -61 — 55.4% +0.48 6–6 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — +1.69
23 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69 1982 1699 144.3 — — — — +20 +43 — 52.0% -0.02 12–9 (57%) 10–5 (67%) — -1.05
24 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22 1983 1648 139.5 — — — — +22 +53 — 39.7% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -1.74
25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40 1984 1565 117.3 — — — — +43 +76 -104 33.3% -1.02 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.48
26 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62 1985 1552 101.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.06
27 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82 — 1855 140.6 — — — — +21 +5 -75 44.6% -0.38 47–48 (49%) 30–36 (45%) 99.0 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.