H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Van Winitsky H2H: 0-1
Van Winitsky holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Van Winitsky leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1978 Miami third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1978* | Miami | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Van Winitsky | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |