H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Victor Amaya H2H: 3-1
Tomas Smid holds a 3–1 lead over Victor Amaya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on clay, while Victor Amaya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1982 Cap D'adge Wct third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Left-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1982* | Cap D'adge Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 6-4 6-3 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1981* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Victor Amaya | 7-5 6-1 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| May 31, 1978* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 7-6 4-6 (ret.) | Victor Amaya | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1977* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Smid | 6-3 7-5 | Victor Amaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Victor Amaya | #739 | #15 | 0 | 1,988 | 187 | 173 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Smid | Victor Amaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #96 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #105 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #85 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #73 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |