H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tomas Smid vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 1-2
Wojtek Fibak holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wojtek Fibak leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1983 Dallas Wct fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1983* | Dallas Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tomas Smid | 3-6 6-3 7-6 6-2 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1982* | Amsterdam Wct | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 6-0 6-2 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1982* | Naples Finals Wct | ATP Finals | SF | Carpet | Wojtek Fibak | 6-1 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tomas Smid | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |