Tomas Zib
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Kevin Kim | 3 | 0 | 3 | Jul 31, 2007 | H2H |
| Tommy Haas | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 2007 | H2H |
| Andrei Pavel | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 13, 2006 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 4, 2004 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Tomas Zib vs Arnaud Di Pasquale H2H: 0-2
Arnaud Di Pasquale holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Di Pasquale leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Di Pasquale won the 2000 Bogota round of 16 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Di Pasquale | 6-4 6-3 | Tomas Zib | Match data | Mar 10, 2000* | R16 | Bogota | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Arnaud Di Pasquale | 6-4 6-1 | Tomas Zib | Match data | Apr 30, 1999* | R16 | Prague | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,637 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arnaud Di Pasquale | — | — | — | 1,733 | 69 | 98 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Arnaud Di Pasquale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–26 | 48.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–25 | 40.5% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–19 | 24.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Arnaud Di Pasquale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1999 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 20 | 42 | 62 | 32.3% | 14 | 36 | 50 | 28.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | 18 | 37 | 55 | 32.7% | 47 | 52 | 99 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 123/134 of Tomas Zib's and 17/17 of Arnaud Di Pasquale's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Arnaud Di Pasquale | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 23 | 1999 | 6/8 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 64.3% | 66.8% | 49.9% | 66.8% | 48.2% | 61.0% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 12/18 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 61.0% | 63.4% | 47.2% | 58.4% | 41.1% | 57.0% | 37.4% | 2003 | 5/5 | 5.4 | 7.4 | 59.7% | 67.7% | 45.6% | 50.0% | 35.7% | 59.2% | 39.0% |
| 25 | 2001 | 12/14 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 63.1% | 65.7% | 43.7% | 41.2% | 47.7% | 57.7% | 33.8% | 2004 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 64.4% | 65.3% | 47.8% | 42.3% | 51.9% | 58.9% | 41.0% |
| 27 | 2003 | 6/6 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 57.8% | 64.6% | 50.3% | 49.9% | 22.2% | 58.6% | 27.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 11/11 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 56.9% | 73.1% | 55.6% | 36.2% | 24.5% | 65.3% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 44/45 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 57.7% | 68.3% | 50.5% | 54.5% | 43.5% | 60.8% | 34.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 24/24 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 56.5% | 65.2% | 48.6% | 51.0% | 32.7% | 57.8% | 31.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7/7 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 59.2% | 72.8% | 47.8% | 58.1% | 55.7% | 62.3% | 31.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1/1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 62.6% | 63.6% | 51.9% | 76.9% | 31.6% | 59.2% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 123/135 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 58.7% | 67.4% | 49.4% | 52.0% | 39.7% | 59.9% | 34.0% | — | 17/167 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 63.0% | 66.0% | 47.1% | 44.5% | 47.1% | 59.0% | 40.4% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Arnaud Di Pasquale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1622 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -2 | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.4 | +0.98 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1687 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | -154 | +129 | — | 47.2% | +0.08 | 7–7 (50%) | 9–13 (41%) | 101.3 | -0.61 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1675 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +10 | — | 42.5% | -0.48 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–9 (44%) | 98.0 | -1.42 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1488 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.05 | 2001 | 1558 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +14 | — | 32.3% | -1.05 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–7 (36%) | 92.7 | -1.57 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1532 | 114.4 | -0.88 | +1.34 | 1.036 | 50.8% | +42 | -22 | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.1 | +0.15 | 2002 | 1638 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -13 | — | 62.5% | +0.78 | 0–2 | 4–0 (100%) | — | +0.72 |
| 24 | 2000 | 1466 | 109.0 | -2.45 | -1.12 | 0.869 | 47.6% | +77 | +6 | — | 30.2% | -1.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 99.4 | +0.93 | 2003 | 1585 | 104.2 | -1.60 | -0.84 | 0.956 | 48.9% | -47 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.35 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–2 | — | +0.32 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1438 | 104.1 | -3.27 | -2.71 | 0.797 | 46.2% | +74 | -29 | +70 | 26.7% | -1.27 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.84 | 2004 | 1531 | 111.8 | -1.76 | +0.98 | 0.997 | 49.4% | — | +37 | — | 27.6% | -1.31 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–4 (20%) | 95.1 | -0.13 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1446 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1512 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 1467 | 112.3 | -1.03 | -2.85 | 0.665 | 43.6% | +18 | — | — | 21.4% | -2.14 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.14 | 2006 | 1500 | 100.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1483 | 116.6 | +0.88 | -0.84 | 0.995 | 48.9% | +57 | -63 | — | 37.9% | -0.52 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1559 | 125.5 | -1.66 | -2.16 | 0.889 | 48.0% | -7 | -52 | -39 | 39.4% | -0.58 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–10 (38%) | 100.8 | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 1510 | 117.1 | -2.65 | -3.89 | 0.738 | 44.8% | -21 | -33 | +10 | 23.2% | -1.89 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–4 (33%) | 93.7 | -0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 1536 | 109.9 | -0.29 | -0.67 | 0.843 | 47.8% | -52 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.50 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1546 | 108.9 | -2.23 | -0.51 | 0.914 | 49.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1544 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1637 | 118.7 | -1.72 | -2.10 | 0.848 | 47.2% | +15 | -33 | +1 | 33.9% | -0.98 | 9–20 (31%) | 21–28 (43%) | 92.8 | +0.73 | — | 1733 | 135.4 | -1.71 | +0.44 | 0.985 | 49.3% | -73 | +48 | — | 43.7% | -0.27 | 20–32 (38%) | 29–41 (41%) | 92.7 | -1.02 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Arnaud Di Pasquale
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Galo Blanco | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 14, 2004 | H2H |
| Andrei Pavel | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 1, 2000 | H2H |
| Nicolas Lapentti | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 16, 2000 | H2H |
| Lleyton Hewitt | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 26, 2004 | H2H |