H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tomas Zib vs Hugo Armando H2H: 0-1

Hugo Armando holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hugo Armando leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hugo Armando won the 2001 Bogota round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Hugo Armando
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hugo Armando #189 6-4 6-4 Tomas Zib #119 Match data Jan 31, 2001* R32 Bogota ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo Armando #1,126 #100 403 1,581 13 30 30.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Zib Hugo Armando
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #167 1,473 0 0
23 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0 2001 4–6 40.0% #123 1,517 0 0
24 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #428 1,498 0 0
25 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0 2003 0–5 0.0% #254 1,441 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2004 4–3 57.1% #161 1,508 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0 2005 1–5 16.7% #178 1,520 0 0
28 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #203 1,478 0 0
29 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #227 1,574 0 0
30 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #458 1,546 0 0
31 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Zib Hugo Armando
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% — 2 3 5 40.0% 11 27 38 28.9% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 123/134 of Tomas Zib's and 42/43 of Hugo Armando's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Zib Hugo Armando
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 1.0 2.5 61.7% 54.3% 51.6% 33.3% 33.3% 52.4% 38.5%
23 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5% 2001 9/10 5.0 3.2 59.1% 69.9% 51.9% 61.5% 28.7% 62.6% 39.3%
24 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4% 2002 2/2 1.5 2.5 57.5% 74.7% 62.8% 50.0% 10.0% 68.3% 31.5%
25 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8% 2003 5/5 2.0 2.0 66.5% 64.6% 49.8% 54.3% 20.7% 58.8% 32.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 7/7 4.0 2.4 60.8% 72.5% 55.5% 38.0% 35.4% 65.4% 34.3%
27 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5% 2005 6/6 2.3 1.8 57.5% 64.9% 42.8% 56.0% 19.4% 55.7% 33.2%
28 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6% 2006 4/4 3.0 2.0 65.3% 71.3% 52.0% 63.7% 33.3% 64.3% 31.8%
29 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9% 2007 5/5 1.2 2.4 61.5% 68.7% 51.1% 65.0% 51.3% 62.3% 43.0%
30 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1% 2008 2/2 1.0 3.0 65.0% 56.9% 50.4% 48.7% 35.6% 54.6% 40.6%
31 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0% — 42/43 2.9 2.5 61.2% 67.9% 51.3% 54.1% 30.3% 61.1% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Zib Hugo Armando
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05 2000 1474 93.5 -2.19 -1.64 0.810 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.20
23 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15 2001 1517 114.5 -0.88 +0.41 1.052 50.5% — 0 — 40.9% -0.23 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.09
24 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93 2002 1499 104.8 -1.06 -2.13 0.993 48.4% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 1–1 — -0.02
25 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84 2003 1442 95.7 -1.37 -2.81 0.780 45.9% — -14 — 16.7% -1.92 0–2 1–0 — +0.40
26 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1508 120.2 +1.28 -0.74 0.990 50.5% +51 -32 — 58.8% +0.29 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — 0.00
27 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14 2005 1520 114.8 -1.01 -3.09 0.748 44.4% — -41 — 26.7% -1.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.49
28 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23 2006 1479 106.8 +0.97 -1.06 0.892 48.3% — -26 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
29 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40 2007 1574 109.1 +0.50 -0.77 1.141 53.1% — +11 — 40.0% +0.20 — 0–1 — +0.03
30 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86 2008 1547 96.3 -1.26 -1.18 0.894 47.3% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.04
31 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73 — 1582 111.8 -0.35 -1.24 0.930 48.7% +51 -14 — 35.4% -0.68 2–8 (20%) 6–9 (40%) 94.9 -0.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.