H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Tomas Zib vs Jacobo Diaz H2H: 1-0
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Jacobo Diaz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 1999 Washington second round 7-6(1) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1999* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | Jacobo Diaz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jacobo Diaz | #833 | #68 | 622 | 1,628 | 28 | 62 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Jacobo Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #419 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #111 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #88 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #396 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |