H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Tomas Zib vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 1-0
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Jean-Rene Lisnard in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2006 Washington second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2007 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-4 6-3 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2006* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 7-5 6-4 | Jean-Rene Lisnard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |