H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Tomas Zib vs Jerome Haehnel H2H: 1-0

Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Jerome Haehnel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jerome Haehnel
FRA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #62 6-3 6-4 Jerome Haehnel #93 Match data Jun 8, 2005* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jerome Haehnel #271 6-2 4-6 6-3 Tomas Zib #135 Match data May 24, 2004 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jerome Haehnel #829 #78 493 1,658 8 18 30.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tomas Zib Jerome Haehnel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0 2004 7–3 70.0% #93 1,649 0 1
24 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0 2005 1–11 8.3% #135 1,521 0 1
25 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #213 1,497 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #240 1,564 0 1
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #591 1,583 0 1
29 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tomas Zib Jerome Haehnel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 0 5 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% — 6 5 11 54.5% 1 9 10 10.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 123/134 of Tomas Zib's and 26/26 of Jerome Haehnel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tomas Zib Jerome Haehnel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5% 2004 10/10 5.0 2.6 59.7% 76.2% 55.2% 70.0% 50.6% 67.5% 34.3%
24 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4% 2005 12/12 3.3 3.3 55.2% 59.9% 46.2% 38.9% 30.2% 53.5% 31.5%
25 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8% 2006 1/1 8.0 5.0 59.4% 71.9% 33.3% 16.7% 40.0% 56.3% 39.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 2.5 3.5 53.9% 62.0% 49.2% 50.0% 41.7% 56.2% 32.4%
27 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 60.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 56.0% 24.0%
29 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0% — 26/26 4.0 3.0 57.2% 66.8% 49.5% 51.3% 38.2% 59.3% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tomas Zib Jerome Haehnel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1502 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1475 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05 2003 1474 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15 2004 1650 122.7 +2.48 -0.18 1.055 51.2% -25 -67 — 66.7% +0.37 2–2 (50%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.06
24 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93 2005 1521 106.6 -5.05 -3.65 0.678 42.9% +97 -22 -17 10.3% -2.34 1–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.77
25 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84 2006 1497 104.2 +0.33 +0.47 0.900 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.08
26 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1564 119.5 -0.44 +0.94 0.741 44.8% — — — 16.7% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.21
27 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14 2008 1549 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23 2009 1584 114.0 -0.34 -0.83 0.545 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
29 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73 — 1659 118.9 -1.41 -1.70 0.802 46.3% +12 -37 -17 34.3% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 102.2 -3.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.