H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tomas Zib vs Jimmy Wang H2H: 1-0
Tomas Zib holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Wang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tomas Zib leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2005 Australian Open first round 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 7-6(5) 6-2 6-4 | Jimmy Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jimmy Wang | #1,017 | #85 | 487 | 1,731 | 22 | 41 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | Jimmy Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #148 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #148 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #174 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |