H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Tomas Zib vs M. Hantschk H2H: 1-2
M. Hantschk holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while M. Hantschk leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, M. Hantschk won the 2001 Memphis second round 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2001* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | M. Hantschk | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
| May 4, 2000* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | M. Hantschk | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2000* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Zib | 6-3 7-6(2) | M. Hantschk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Hantschk | #1,233 | #71 | 575 | 1,608 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tomas Zib | M. Hantschk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |