H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Alejandro Falla H2H: 5-1

Tommy Haas holds a 5–1 lead over Alejandro Falla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2014 Munich fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H

5 – 1

6 main draw meetings

Alejandro Falla

COL Age 42 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
May 2, 2014*	Munich	ATP 250	R16	Clay	Tommy Haas #16	6-2 6-4	Alejandro Falla #71	Match data
Sep 1, 2011*	US Open	Grand Slam	R64	Hard	Tommy Haas #475	7-6(5) 6-1 7-5	Alejandro Falla #119	Match data
Sep 2, 2009*	US Open	Grand Slam	R128	Hard	Tommy Haas #21	7-5 4-6 7-6(7) 6-2	Alejandro Falla #160	Match data
Aug 16, 2008*	Washington	ATP 500	QF	Hard	Tommy Haas #48	7-5 6-1	Alejandro Falla #122	Match data
Aug 1, 2007*	Washington	ATP 500	R32	Hard	Tommy Haas #12	6-3 6-2	Alejandro Falla #129	Match data
Mar 22, 2007*	Miami Masters	Masters 1000	R64	Hard	Alejandro Falla #95	6-4 6-4	Tommy Haas #9	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Tommy Haas	#616	#2	3,030	2,103	533	330	61.8%	0	1	0	3	11	15
Alejandro Falla	#646	#50	869	1,813	97	158	38.0%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tommy Haas							Alejandro Falla
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
18	1996	4–3	57.1%	#170	1,587	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1997	22–17	56.4%	#45	1,721	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1998	34–26	56.7%	#34	1,840	0	0	2004	5–7	41.7%	#127	1,596	0	0
21	1999	45–23	66.2%	#11	1,859	0	1	2005	0–2	0.0%	#231	1,532	0	0
22	2000	27–20	57.4%	#23	1,777	0	1	2006	4–8	33.3%	#108	1,618	0	0
23	2001	53–21	71.6%	#8	2,009	0	5	2007	12–16	42.9%	#81	1,738	0	0
24	2002	43–22	66.2%	#11	1,849	0	5	2008	6–11	35.3%	#180	1,603	0	0
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2009	2–8	20.0%	#81	1,744	0	0
26	2004	35–18	66.0%	#17	1,909	0	7	2010	14–19	42.4%	#105	1,684	0	0
27	2005	28–21	57.1%	#45	1,766	0	7	2011	9–14	39.1%	#74	1,714	0	0
28	2006	48–19	71.6%	#11	1,893	0	10	2012	14–23	37.8%	#54	1,756	0	0
29	2007	36–17	67.9%	#12	1,892	0	11	2013	13–20	39.4%	#99	1,707	0	0
30	2008	18–15	54.5%	#82	1,855	0	11	2014	9–17	34.6%	#88	1,625	0	0
31	2009	31–18	63.3%	#18	1,913	0	12	2015	7–11	38.9%	#122	1,713	0	0
32	2010	3–4	42.9%	#372	1,844	0	12	2016	1–1	50.0%	#273	1,557	0	0
33	2011	7–12	36.8%	#205	1,762	0	12	2017	1–1	50.0%	#397	1,578	0	0
34	2012	31–17	64.6%	#21	1,966	0	13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	2013	46–23	66.7%	#12	2,011	0	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	2014	14–11	56.0%	#77	1,904	0	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	2015	2–9	18.2%	#470	1,784	0	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	2017	6–14	30.0%	#252	1,686	0	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—