H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Andy Roddick H2H: 7-6

Tommy Haas holds a 7–6 lead over Andy Roddick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 5–3 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2011 Swiss Indoors first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7 – 6
13 main draw meetings
Andy Roddick
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andy Roddick #15 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #212 Match data Nov 3, 2011* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Andy Roddick #6 1-6 7-6(9) 6-4 Tommy Haas #75 Match data May 13, 2009* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Andy Roddick #6 7-5 6-4 Tommy Haas #65 Match data Feb 14, 2009* QF San Jose ATP 250 Hard
Tommy Haas #36 6-4 6-4 Andy Roddick #6 Match data Mar 16, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #9 6-3 6-2 Andy Roddick #4 Match data Feb 25, 2007* F Memphis International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #27 6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 Andy Roddick #4 Match data Apr 15, 2006* QF U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andy Roddick #3 7-6(3) 6-3 Tommy Haas #17 Match data Feb 12, 2005* SF San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Andy Roddick #2 4-6 6-3 9-7 Tommy Haas #46 Match data Aug 18, 2004* R32 Athens Olympics Olympics Hard
Andy Roddick #2 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #67 Match data Aug 8, 2004* QF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #349 6-3 6-4 Andy Roddick #2 Match data Apr 18, 2004* F U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #7 6-1 7-5 Andy Roddick #14 Match data May 12, 2002* SF Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #7 6-3 6-2 Andy Roddick #13 Match data Apr 20, 2002* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tommy Haas #21 6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 Andy Roddick #124 Match data Feb 22, 2001* R32 Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Andy Roddick #40 #1 5,800 2,175 580 198 74.6% 1 5 0 5 21 32

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Andy Roddick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 4–5 44.4% #156 1,561 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2001 39–16 70.9% #14 1,854 0 3
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2002 51–19 72.9% #10 1,922 0 5
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2003 71–18 79.8% #1 2,091 1 11
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2004 68–16 81.0% #2 2,068 1 15
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2005 56–14 80.0% #3 2,036 1 20
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2006 46–17 73.0% #6 2,008 1 21
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2007 48–16 75.0% #6 2,009 1 23
25 — — — — — — — 2008 47–16 74.6% #8 2,007 1 26
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2009 47–15 75.8% #7 2,045 1 27
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2010 48–18 72.7% #8 1,990 1 29
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2011 32–15 68.1% #14 2,025 1 30
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2012 23–13 63.9% #39 1,990 1 32
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Andy Roddick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 20 10 30 66.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2002 32 11 43 74.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 44 10 54 81.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 1 11 90.9% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 51 11 62 82.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 29 9 38 76.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 1 12 91.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 36 11 47 76.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 38 12 50 76.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 33 11 44 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 42 15 57 73.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 27 11 38 71.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 407 137 544 74.8% 67 29 96 69.8% 83 22 105 79.0% 23 10 33 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 752/778 of Andy Roddick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Andy Roddick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 7/9 7.4 2.1 56.8% 76.4% 57.4% 61.0% 37.5% 68.5% 33.1%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2001 50/55 10.4 3.6 58.9% 80.0% 57.0% 66.5% 37.5% 70.3% 37.0%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2002 62/70 9.0 2.6 61.4% 79.8% 54.3% 64.2% 43.5% 70.0% 37.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2003 87/89 11.1 2.1 61.8% 80.6% 58.7% 63.1% 44.2% 72.2% 37.3%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2004 81/84 12.6 2.3 63.6% 81.2% 56.9% 69.8% 42.3% 72.3% 38.0%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2005 69/70 13.2 1.9 65.7% 82.6% 58.1% 70.6% 44.9% 74.1% 36.7%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2006 62/63 11.4 1.5 66.8% 79.9% 56.0% 70.1% 46.0% 71.9% 38.3%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2007 64/64 11.7 1.5 64.3% 80.8% 57.2% 65.2% 42.0% 72.4% 34.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 62/63 14.3 2.1 67.2% 78.4% 56.0% 65.8% 39.5% 71.1% 36.0%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2009 61/62 12.5 1.4 69.8% 79.4% 58.6% 61.6% 40.3% 73.0% 36.4%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2010 66/66 12.3 1.5 68.7% 79.6% 59.2% 67.2% 37.4% 73.0% 35.2%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2011 47/47 12.1 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 56.5% 62.5% 44.0% 69.7% 36.3%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2012 34/36 10.1 1.9 66.4% 75.8% 56.1% 64.8% 37.1% 69.2% 35.1%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 752/778 11.8 2.0 64.8% 79.8% 57.2% 66.1% 41.8% 71.8% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Andy Roddick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1562 130.0 +2.92 -1.89 1.051 50.8% +7 — — 42.9% -0.29 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.45
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2001 1854 151.7 +6.98 -0.04 1.246 53.2% -50 -84 -182 70.6% +1.13 7–8 (47%) 20–11 (65%) — +0.34
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2002 1922 150.3 +6.65 +0.05 1.243 53.3% -11 -76 -241 67.9% +1.02 11–3 (79%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.39
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2003 2091 158.5 +9.31 +1.00 1.343 54.4% -9 -246 -131 73.2% +1.35 17–5 (77%) 35–20 (64%) — -0.15
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2004 2068 162.3 +8.68 +2.20 1.370 54.4% +33 -249 +34 76.8% +1.43 11–6 (65%) 35–10 (78%) — -0.37
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2005 2037 158.9 +9.75 +0.54 1.415 54.5% +35 -205 +243 73.3% +1.41 15–6 (71%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.17
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2006 2009 154.0 +8.35 +1.30 1.362 54.5% +43 -198 +195 70.4% +1.39 11–7 (61%) 16–17 (48%) — +3.03
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2007 2010 157.9 +8.22 -1.05 1.237 53.0% +51 -248 +218 70.9% +1.07 7–2 (78%) 29–12 (71%) — +1.00
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2007 161.4 +7.15 +0.61 1.248 53.2% +42 -189 +148 69.0% +1.19 14–7 (67%) 23–17 (58%) — +0.50
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2009 2045 166.9 +8.85 +1.67 1.350 54.2% +9 -178 +250 72.2% +1.21 8–7 (53%) 32–11 (74%) — -0.24
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2010 1991 164.1 +8.60 +0.23 1.305 53.4% +45 -129 +236 67.5% +0.97 11–7 (61%) 23–17 (58%) — +2.84
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2011 2025 162.2 +5.97 +0.87 1.200 52.6% +41 — +182 63.9% +0.83 7–3 (70%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.24
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2012 1991 148.1 +4.71 -0.49 1.139 52.1% +25 — +178 60.7% +0.44 7–3 (70%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.02
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2176 164.1 +7.98 +0.64 1.296 53.7% +22 -172 +108 70.1% +1.15 127–64 (66%) 280–166 (63%) 109.2 +1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.