H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Andy Roddick H2H: 7-5
Tommy Haas holds a 7–5 lead over Andy Roddick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 4–3 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2011 Basel third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
7
–
5
12 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2011* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| May 13, 2009* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 1-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2009* | San Jose | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-5 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-4 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2007* | Memphis | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-2 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2006* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-3 6-3 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2004* | Houston | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| May 12, 2002* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-1 7-5 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-3 6-2 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2001* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tommy Haas | 6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |