H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 5-0

Tommy Haas holds a 5–0 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2004 Munich Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Bohdan Ulihrach
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #134 6-3 6-2 Bohdan Ulihrach #130 Match data Apr 29, 2004* R32 Munich Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #16 6-1 6-4 Bohdan Ulihrach #34 Match data Oct 13, 2001* QF Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #19 7-5 3-6 6-3 Bohdan Ulihrach #114 Match data May 5, 2000* R16 Munich Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #39 6-1 3-6 6-2 Bohdan Ulihrach #32 Match data Oct 1, 1998* R32 Mallorca ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #79 6-1 6-2 Bohdan Ulihrach #23 Match data Jun 12, 1997* R32 Halle Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Bohdan Ulihrach #805 #22 1,399 1,840 218 236 48.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Bohdan Ulihrach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #472 1,491 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #142 1,475 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1995 29–20 59.2% #28 1,715 0 2
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1996 34–31 52.3% #41 1,767 0 2
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1997 26–27 49.1% #34 1,770 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1998 31–28 52.5% #33 1,757 0 3
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1999 12–22 35.3% #107 1,650 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2000 15–17 46.9% #76 1,664 0 3
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2001 34–26 56.7% #32 1,774 0 3
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2002 21–27 43.8% #75 1,683 0 3
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2003 3–6 33.3% #246 1,629 0 3
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2004 11–19 36.7% #86 1,608 0 3
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2005 1–8 11.1% #285 1,561 0 3
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2006 0–1 0.0% #349 1,558 0 3
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2007 1–2 33.3% #164 1,596 0 3
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 27 17 44 61.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 9 8 17 52.9% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 17 11 28 60.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 19 13 32 59.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 79 84 163 48.5% 110 102 212 51.9% 5 14 19 26.3% 24 36 60 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 409/454 of Bohdan Ulihrach's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 1993 1/1 1.0 6.0 41.9% 65.4% 38.9% 16.7% 33.3% 50.0% 30.2%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1994 1/1 1.0 0.0 42.6% 25.0% 63.0% 33.3% 50.0% 46.8% 33.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1995 43/49 2.7 3.6 52.7% 67.2% 47.9% 59.0% 49.2% 58.1% 44.1%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1996 58/65 3.4 3.7 56.1% 69.1% 48.4% 54.7% 44.1% 60.0% 40.9%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1997 48/53 3.3 3.6 54.8% 71.2% 51.6% 57.3% 50.1% 62.5% 38.6%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1998 53/59 3.1 3.6 58.0% 68.4% 49.0% 55.0% 43.5% 60.1% 40.8%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1999 29/34 4.0 4.6 58.3% 68.5% 49.9% 57.9% 34.3% 60.5% 37.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 31/32 2.7 4.0 58.5% 64.7% 46.7% 59.1% 42.1% 56.9% 40.6%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2001 53/60 3.1 3.5 57.8% 69.5% 49.5% 53.9% 43.5% 60.9% 39.7%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2002 40/48 3.5 3.1 64.0% 66.1% 49.7% 60.5% 39.8% 60.0% 36.8%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2003 9/9 3.2 2.6 64.4% 67.0% 50.0% 64.0% 30.6% 60.9% 33.9%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2004 30/30 3.1 4.0 57.4% 69.4% 48.3% 54.7% 37.4% 60.4% 34.6%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2005 9/9 1.8 3.2 65.5% 59.8% 46.0% 57.1% 27.6% 55.6% 28.3%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.9% 52.6% 40.0% 45.5% 28.6% 47.1% 44.7%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2007 3/3 12.7 8.7 60.2% 72.1% 50.5% 59.4% 22.8% 63.5% 32.7%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 409/454 3.2 3.7 57.6% 68.1% 49.0% 56.7% 42.6% 59.9% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Bohdan Ulihrach
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 1993 1492 103.0 -0.80 -2.87 0.604 40.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1994 1475 96.1 -0.13 -1.57 0.627 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.20
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 1995 1715 141.9 -2.10 +3.88 1.052 50.9% -145 +66 — 58.7% +0.45 9–9 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.47
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1996 1768 146.5 -0.84 +2.63 1.024 50.5% -108 +57 -149 50.6% +0.01 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.71
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 1997 1770 148.6 +0.96 +1.58 1.028 50.5% +3 -23 — 52.8% +0.24 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — -2.52
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1998 1757 145.7 -0.99 +2.84 1.022 50.3% -27 +71 — 52.0% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.52
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1999 1651 135.6 -1.17 -0.40 0.936 48.8% +16 +125 — 40.6% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.70
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1665 136.1 -4.20 +2.29 0.943 48.8% -33 +149 — 47.3% -0.43 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.94
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2001 1774 146.7 -0.26 +2.07 1.016 50.3% +3 +61 — 53.1% +0.08 14–7 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — -1.57
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2002 1683 138.8 -1.87 +0.24 0.921 48.5% -8 +77 -217 45.5% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.48
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2003 1629 108.5 -1.16 -2.85 0.867 47.3% +17 — — 31.8% -1.05 1–0 0–1 — +0.30
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2004 1609 123.8 -2.09 -1.61 0.874 47.8% +63 -9 — 38.5% -0.72 1–6 (14%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.16
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2005 1561 117.4 -3.44 -1.79 0.637 42.8% +81 +5 — 15.0% -2.05 — 0–2 — -1.14
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2006 1558 99.4 +0.19 -2.67 0.845 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.10
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2007 1597 106.2 +0.35 -3.60 0.896 48.4% — — — 38.5% -0.15 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2008 1587 107.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1840 145.5 -1.23 +1.51 0.976 49.5% -12 +69 -188 48.5% -0.13 63–71 (47%) 58–74 (44%) 95.0 -2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.