H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Carlos Moya H2H: 6-4

Tommy Haas holds a 6–4 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 5–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2008 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-2.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 4
10 main draw meetings
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #46 6-3 6-2 Carlos Moya #28 Match data
May 12, 2002* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Tommy Haas #7 6-3 6-4 Carlos Moya #25 Match data
Mar 7, 2002* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Carlos Moya #25 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 Tommy Haas #6 Match data
Apr 19, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #23 1-6 6-3 6-3 Carlos Moya #25 Match data
Apr 29, 2000* Barcelona ATP 250 QF Clay Carlos Moya #39 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #20 Match data
Jul 24, 1999* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Haas #16 7-6(3) 6-2 Carlos Moya #9 Match data
May 6, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #34 6-2 7-5 Carlos Moya #14 Match data
Oct 2, 1997* Basel ATP 250 R32 Carpet Carlos Moya #5 6-4 3-6 6-4 Tommy Haas #76 Match data
May 15, 1997* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Carlos Moya #8 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #82 Match data
May 8, 1997* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #126 6-4 6-1 Carlos Moya #9 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Carlos Moya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7
25 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15