H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Christophe Rochus H2H: 3-0

Tommy Haas holds a 3–0 lead over Christophe Rochus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2009 San Jose fourth round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Christophe Rochus
BEL Age 47 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 2009* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #65 6-2 7-5 Christophe Rochus #76 Match data
Aug 25, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #31 6-2 4-6 6-0 Christophe Rochus #52 Match data
Nov 15, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Tommy Haas #25 7-5 6-4 Christophe Rochus #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Christophe Rochus #998 #38 1,248 1,740 114 208 35.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Christophe Rochus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #121 1,502 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2000 14–22 38.9% #74 1,555 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2001 14–21 40.0% #69 1,617 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2002 10–21 32.3% #143 1,516 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2003 12–18 40.0% #84 1,573 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2004 9–18 33.3% #113 1,561 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2005 18–26 40.9% #41 1,554 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2006 15–26 36.6% #78 1,538 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2007 2–9 18.2% #194 1,609 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2008 5–7 41.7% #69 1,689 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2009 14–28 33.3% #86 1,610 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2010 0–10 0.0% #249 1,551 0 0
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —