H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1998 Rome Masters second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #45 4-6 6-3 6-3 Diego Nargiso #117 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1988 10–12 45.5% #90 1,621 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,590 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,618 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,603 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,596 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,525 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,530 0 0
25 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,528 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,524 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,612 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15