H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 5-1

Tommy Haas holds a 5–1 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 26, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tommy Haas #13 6-3 7-5 7-5 Dmitry Tursunov #65 Match data
Jul 1, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tommy Haas #10 1-6 6-4 7-6(5) 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #23 Match data
Aug 10, 2006* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Dmitry Tursunov #27 7-5 2-6 6-1 Tommy Haas #17 Match data
Jul 30, 2006* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Tommy Haas #21 4-6 7-5 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #33 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #30 6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #50 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Tommy Haas #349 6-2 6-0 Dmitry Tursunov #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,914 223 215 50.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,681 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,738 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,785 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2008 35–21 62.5% #22 1,861 0 5
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,705 0 6
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,767 0 7
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2012 3–9 25.0% #122 1,698 0 7
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,746 0 7
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,676 0 7
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,622 0 7
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —