H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 5-1

Tommy Haas holds a 5–1 lead over Dmitry Tursunov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #13 6-3 7-5 7-5 Dmitry Tursunov #65 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tommy Haas #10 1-6 6-4 7-6(5) 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #23 Match data Jul 1, 2007* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Dmitry Tursunov #27 7-5 2-6 6-1 Tommy Haas #17 Match data Aug 10, 2006* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #21 4-6 7-5 6-3 Dmitry Tursunov #33 Match data Jul 30, 2006* F Los Angeles Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Tommy Haas #30 6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 Dmitry Tursunov #50 Match data Feb 25, 2006* QF Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tommy Haas #349 6-2 6-0 Dmitry Tursunov #74 Match data Apr 17, 2004* QF U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 429/440 7.4 3.9 57.4% 73.1% 50.5% 60.1% 42.4% 63.3% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 — +0.16
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 — — 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 -1.08
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 — -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -1.22
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) 102.4 +1.38
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) 104.7 +2.65
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) 107.5 -0.15
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 — +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 +1.41
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 — — 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.47
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 — +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 105.2 -0.69
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 — +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 — 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) 112.1 +0.52
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 98.4 +0.04
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2015 1753 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 — — 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 -0.60
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.