H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 4-2

Tommy Haas holds a 4–2 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on clay, while Ernests Gulbis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Stuttgart fourth round 6-0 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 12, 2013* Stuttgart ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Haas #11 6-0 3-6 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #36 Match data
Jun 14, 2013* Halle ATP 500 R16 Grass Tommy Haas #11 7-6(5) 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #38 Match data
May 3, 2013* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Tommy Haas #14 6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #47 Match data
Mar 2, 2013* Delray Beach ATP 250 SF Hard Ernests Gulbis #109 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) Tommy Haas #19 Match data
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ernests Gulbis #145 3-6 4-6 6-4 7-5 6-3 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
May 12, 2009* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tommy Haas #75 6-2 5-7 7-5 Ernests Gulbis #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —