H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 5-3

Tommy Haas holds a 5–3 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 4–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2002 Madrid Masters third round 7-6(7) 4-1 RET.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2002* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #50 7-6(7) 4-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #3 Match data
Aug 4, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tommy Haas #3 6-4 4-6 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #40 Match data
Aug 12, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #15 6-0 6-7(1) 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #41 Match data
Jan 27, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Haas #33 6-2 6-3 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #68 Match data
Oct 23, 1998* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tommy Haas #53 2-6 6-3 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #36 Match data
Aug 6, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #41 7-6(8) 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #29 Match data
May 7, 1998* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #29 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #34 Match data
Oct 19, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 F Carpet Fabrice Santoro #42 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15