H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Wimbledon third round 4-6 6-2 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2013* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Tommy Haas #13 4-6 6-2 7-5 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #32 Match data
Feb 22, 2013* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Feliciano Lopez #47 (w/o) Tommy Haas #18 Match data
Jun 10, 2004* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Tommy Haas #112 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #21 Match data
May 31, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tommy Haas #3 6-3 6-4 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7