H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Felix Mantilla H2H: 2-2

Tommy Haas and Felix Mantilla are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Felix Mantilla leads 2–0 on clay, while Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 US Open round of 64 6-1 6-0 6-7(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Felix Mantilla
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #15 6-1 6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 Felix Mantilla #63 Match data Aug 31, 2001* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Felix Mantilla #15 7-6(3) 6-1 6-4 Tommy Haas #19 Match data May 30, 1999* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tommy Haas #35 4-6 6-3 6-3 Felix Mantilla #20 Match data Jan 16, 1999* SF ASB Classic ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Felix Mantilla #15 4-6 6-3 6-4 Tommy Haas #126 Match data May 11, 1997* SF Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Felix Mantilla #1,133 #10 2,385 1,960 307 218 58.5% 0 1 0 1 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Felix Mantilla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #233 1,494 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1995 10–5 66.7% #92 1,624 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1996 48–27 64.0% #18 1,778 0 1
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1997 49–22 69.0% #16 1,846 0 6
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1998 43–26 62.3% #20 1,807 0 7
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1999 33–21 61.1% #22 1,723 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 2000 13–16 44.8% #99 1,671 0 8
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2001 26–20 56.5% #45 1,775 0 9
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2002 26–25 51.0% #55 1,732 0 9
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2003 27–22 55.1% #22 1,706 0 10
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2004 17–15 53.1% #102 1,693 0 10
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2005 14–15 48.3% #117 1,668 0 10
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2007 1–3 25.0% #425 1,650 0 10
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Felix Mantilla
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 44 20 64 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 38 8 46 82.6% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 14 10 24 58.3% 27 14 41 65.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 23 9 32 71.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 14 11 25 56.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 3 4 7 42.9% 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 67 69 136 49.3% 229 122 351 65.2% 5 10 15 33.3% 6 17 23 26.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 454/525 of Felix Mantilla's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Felix Mantilla
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 1994 1/1 0.0 0.0 71.3% 59.7% 51.9% 55.6% 50.0% 57.4% 36.4%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 1995 14/15 1.0 0.7 67.3% 61.3% 53.5% 59.0% 46.8% 58.5% 44.0%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1996 63/75 2.3 1.3 68.9% 65.3% 53.8% 52.2% 53.5% 61.3% 42.1%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 1997 58/71 2.4 2.0 66.0% 67.5% 51.7% 59.6% 45.4% 62.5% 43.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1998 60/69 3.9 2.4 60.8% 71.0% 53.5% 63.1% 45.3% 63.8% 40.7%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1999 43/54 3.7 2.4 56.6% 70.8% 53.6% 61.8% 55.8% 63.2% 41.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 23/29 1.9 1.7 60.8% 64.9% 50.3% 55.9% 50.7% 58.9% 39.3%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2001 40/46 3.5 3.1 57.2% 70.0% 52.4% 61.2% 49.9% 62.2% 39.7%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2002 41/51 2.7 2.2 61.2% 67.8% 51.9% 55.9% 39.0% 61.5% 40.0%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2003 46/49 2.9 2.9 61.1% 66.9% 51.0% 48.0% 42.2% 60.9% 38.8%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2004 32/32 3.1 3.8 56.9% 68.1% 51.1% 55.3% 41.5% 60.2% 41.2%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2005 29/29 2.7 3.1 59.0% 68.3% 48.3% 54.5% 47.9% 60.0% 40.6%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2007 4/4 0.8 0.8 69.8% 59.6% 56.7% 55.8% 48.5% 58.7% 37.6%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 454/525 2.9 2.3 61.9% 67.8% 52.2% 57.0% 47.2% 61.6% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Felix Mantilla
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 1994 1495 106.2 +3.09 -0.67 0.855 48.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.16
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 1995 1625 127.9 -0.29 +1.66 1.060 51.3% — +56 — 61.1% +0.69 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 107.0 +1.16
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 1996 1778 139.6 +0.14 +2.98 1.088 51.6% -200 +80 — 58.2% +0.45 17–8 (68%) 15–13 (54%) 109.2 +1.68
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 1997 1847 148.9 +1.00 +4.16 1.147 52.7% -196 +202 — 65.0% +1.10 13–8 (62%) 11–10 (52%) 102.8 +0.99
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 1998 1808 148.2 +1.79 +2.28 1.123 52.2% -70 +129 -192 58.8% +0.55 9–9 (50%) 14–16 (47%) 96.1 -0.77
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 1999 1724 145.5 +1.55 +2.82 1.124 52.4% -41 +194 -147 58.8% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 15–5 (75%) 106.3 +0.19
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1671 133.5 -1.51 +1.13 0.956 49.2% -32 +141 — 45.5% -0.38 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.8 -0.64
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 2001 1775 141.5 +0.87 +1.90 1.049 51.0% -132 +96 — 50.5% 0.00 11–4 (73%) 9–7 (56%) 109.2 -1.74
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2002 1733 142.5 -0.70 +2.36 1.039 50.6% -11 +30 — 50.4% -0.08 7–9 (44%) 8–11 (42%) 97.7 -0.92
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 2003 1706 146.2 -1.06 +1.53 0.991 49.9% -49 +204 — 53.6% +0.16 8–6 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.4 -1.54
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 2004 1694 123.4 -1.88 +2.08 1.035 50.7% -92 +132 — 50.6% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 7–7 (50%) 97.3 +1.59
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 2005 1668 134.5 -1.04 +1.97 1.015 50.6% — +130 — 47.9% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.9 +0.67
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2007 1650 117.0 -2.23 +0.32 0.910 47.9% — +105 — 36.4% -0.55 1–2 (33%) — — +0.18
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1960 147.5 +0.14 +2.43 1.066 51.3% -85 +130 -173 55.6% +0.34 91–70 (57%) 104–92 (53%) 107.7 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.