H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-2

Tommy Haas holds a 3–2 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2015 US Open first round 3-6 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #42 3-6 6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #506 Match data
Feb 13, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #12 6-7(4) 7-6(1) 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #32 Match data
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 3-6 7-5 7-6(8) 1-6 6-4 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Mar 18, 2008* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #36 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #30 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #17 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7