H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Florian Mayer H2H: 5-0

Tommy Haas holds a 5–0 lead over Florian Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2013 Munich Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Florian Mayer
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #14 6-4 6-1 Florian Mayer #27 Match data May 4, 2013* QF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Tommy Haas #48 6-1 6-4 Florian Mayer #23 Match data Jul 21, 2012* QF Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Tommy Haas #12 7-6(3) 6-3 6-3 Florian Mayer #58 Match data Jan 21, 2007* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tommy Haas #22 6-1 6-2 6-4 Florian Mayer #54 Match data May 25, 2005* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tommy Haas #30 6-3 6-4 Florian Mayer #34 Match data Oct 15, 2004* R16 Vienna Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Florian Mayer #256 #18 1,735 1,956 227 251 47.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Florian Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2004 19–17 52.8% #35 1,724 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2005 20–24 45.5% #72 1,723 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2006 24–21 53.3% #56 1,719 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2007 17–23 42.5% #55 1,618 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2008 2–9 18.2% #409 1,537 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 3–6 33.3% #61 1,666 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2010 21–19 52.5% #37 1,801 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2011 42–24 63.6% #23 1,940 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2012 19–24 44.2% #28 1,798 0 1
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2013 27–25 51.9% #40 1,861 0 1
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2014 7–7 50.0% #147 1,888 0 1
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2015 4–9 30.8% #217 1,790 0 1
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2016 10–11 47.6% #50 1,811 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2017 10–17 37.0% #69 1,760 0 2
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2018 2–15 11.8% #256 1,594 0 2
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Florian Mayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 4 9 13 30.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 23 15 38 60.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 9 13 22 40.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2013 13 15 28 46.4% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2018 0 5 5 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 99 131 230 43.0% 86 90 176 48.9% 39 26 65 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 473/478 of Florian Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Florian Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2004 35/36 4.6 2.6 60.1% 69.0% 52.0% 58.7% 40.5% 62.2% 38.3%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2005 44/44 3.5 2.0 61.7% 67.4% 46.5% 53.8% 43.3% 59.4% 36.3%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2006 45/45 4.5 1.7 61.9% 72.5% 51.2% 52.6% 45.0% 64.2% 40.6%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2007 40/40 4.6 1.8 61.8% 68.4% 49.5% 47.5% 40.6% 61.2% 37.3%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2008 11/11 2.5 1.5 61.1% 63.4% 45.6% 47.0% 45.2% 56.5% 35.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 9/9 3.4 1.4 64.7% 67.8% 52.8% 50.1% 29.9% 62.7% 37.1%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2010 39/40 4.3 1.7 63.6% 71.3% 53.1% 64.5% 39.5% 64.4% 37.1%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2011 66/66 3.7 2.0 59.8% 71.3% 52.7% 58.4% 47.5% 63.6% 39.3%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2012 42/43 4.2 1.3 61.0% 70.9% 53.0% 57.4% 41.7% 63.7% 34.8%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2013 52/52 4.4 1.7 63.1% 68.4% 51.5% 55.8% 41.8% 62.2% 37.0%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2014 13/14 6.0 1.4 62.6% 66.6% 52.3% 60.8% 49.8% 61.3% 38.3%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2015 13/13 5.1 1.5 64.0% 64.3% 47.6% 58.8% 43.2% 58.3% 33.9%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2016 20/21 4.6 1.5 63.3% 71.2% 49.8% 53.8% 41.2% 63.3% 34.1%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2017 27/27 4.2 1.7 61.4% 69.6% 51.3% 61.8% 42.9% 62.5% 32.4%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2018 17/17 3.6 2.1 59.2% 65.5% 48.4% 59.0% 36.4% 58.5% 33.5%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 473/478 4.2 1.8 61.7% 69.4% 50.9% 56.3% 42.6% 62.2% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Florian Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2004 1725 137.2 +0.54 +1.23 1.014 50.1% -126 -13 -31 53.9% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.20
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2005 1724 137.0 -2.41 -0.72 0.893 48.1% -85 +5 +29 43.8% -0.60 7–3 (70%) 6–6 (50%) — -2.13
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2006 1720 136.8 +1.98 +2.41 1.131 52.0% -75 +52 +39 52.3% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.24
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2007 1619 134.0 -0.59 +0.75 0.962 49.0% +27 +49 +119 43.4% -0.28 4–5 (44%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2008 1538 114.4 -3.82 -1.01 0.823 46.3% +41 — — 22.7% -1.23 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.13
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1667 132.6 -0.44 -0.02 0.994 49.6% +28 — — 39.1% -0.30 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.01
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2010 1801 152.2 +1.23 +0.62 1.044 50.8% -13 -82 +3 53.6% +0.29 8–5 (62%) 10–7 (59%) — -0.46
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2011 1941 154.2 +1.16 +2.09 1.081 51.2% -21 -47 -127 59.2% +0.39 9–4 (69%) 13–6 (68%) — +1.25
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2012 1799 150.3 +0.84 -1.03 0.960 49.3% -6 -9 +188 48.5% -0.12 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.65
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2013 1861 153.3 -0.17 +0.37 0.978 49.6% -38 -39 +104 49.2% -0.08 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.13
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2014 1889 146.1 -0.12 +1.13 0.988 49.5% -31 — — 56.8% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.70
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2015 1790 121.4 -3.24 -0.95 0.812 46.4% — -41 +139 37.5% -1.09 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.28
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2016 1811 135.4 -0.43 -0.48 0.929 48.7% -17 -148 +181 40.4% -0.47 3–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) — -2.04
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2017 1760 136.7 -0.19 -1.94 0.865 48.0% -94 -20 +178 35.6% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–11 (8%) — -0.36
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 2018 1594 122.8 -3.14 -1.85 0.807 46.1% +12 +22 +258 20.9% -1.54 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.13
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1956 149.9 -0.06 +0.39 0.978 49.5% -29 -15 +102 47.6% -0.15 61–52 (54%) 71–87 (45%) 100.8 -1.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.