H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs George Bastl H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2006 Indianapolis round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #21 6-3 6-3 George Bastl #144 Match data Jul 20, 2006* R32 Indianapolis ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.