H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-3

Gilles Muller holds a 3–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2017 Madrid Open first round 6-4 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilles Muller #26 6-4 7-6(7) Tommy Haas #403 Match data May 9, 2017* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Gilles Muller #92 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #895 Match data Jun 22, 2011* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Gilles Muller #130 2-6 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #39 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tommy Haas #30 6-3 6-2 Gilles Muller #71 Match data Feb 4, 2006* QF Delray Beach Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Gilles Muller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 397/405 of Gilles Muller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Gilles Muller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7%
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1%
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Gilles Muller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.52
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) — -2.15
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) — +1.32
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.16
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) — -0.32
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) — -1.66
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.20
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.77
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) — -1.33
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) — -1.98
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) — -0.32
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) — +1.28
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.