H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-3

Gilles Muller holds a 3–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2017 Madrid Masters second round 6-4 7-6(7).

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 9, 2017* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Gilles Muller #26 6-4 7-6(7) Tommy Haas #403 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Gilles Muller #92 7-6(5) 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #895 Match data
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Gilles Muller #130 2-6 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #39 Match data
Feb 4, 2006* Delray Beach ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #30 6-3 6-2 Gilles Muller #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15