H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 2-4

Guillermo Canas holds a 4–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2008 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Guillermo Canas
ARG Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tommy Haas #38 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Canas #44 Match data
Nov 6, 2004* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Guillermo Canas #14 7-6(4) 6-2 Tommy Haas #18 Match data
Oct 16, 2004* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Guillermo Canas #26 6-4 6-3 Tommy Haas #30 Match data
Mar 23, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Guillermo Canas #97 6-1 7-6(6) Tommy Haas #356 Match data
Aug 4, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Guillermo Canas #19 6-4 3-6 7-6(5) Tommy Haas #3 Match data
Oct 14, 2001* Vienna ATP 250 F Hard Tommy Haas #16 6-2 7-6(6) 6-4 Guillermo Canas #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Guillermo Canas #1,110 #8 2,075 2,008 244 188 56.5% 0 1 0 0 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Guillermo Canas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1996 0–3 0.0% #183 1,462 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #129 1,461 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1998 6–14 30.0% #95 1,481 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1999 15–23 39.5% #71 1,575 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2000 5–12 29.4% #231 1,530 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2001 45–21 68.2% #15 1,840 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2002 41–22 65.1% #15 1,857 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2003 5–4 55.6% #272 1,805 0 3
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2004 40–21 65.6% #12 1,898 0 6
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2005 22–11 66.7% #102 1,889 0 6
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2007 38–21 64.4% #15 1,821 0 7
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2008 21–19 52.5% #79 1,690 0 7
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2009 5–13 27.8% #191 1,628 0 7
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —