H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-3

Hicham Arazi holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Hicham Arazi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2001 Stuttgart Masters fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #14 4-6 6-3 7-6(1) Hicham Arazi #29 Match data
May 17, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Hicham Arazi #28 2-6 7-6(8) 7-5 Tommy Haas #21 Match data
Apr 19, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Hicham Arazi #26 3-6 6-1 6-1 Tommy Haas #17 Match data
Sep 5, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tommy Haas #14 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 7-6(3) Hicham Arazi #43 Match data
Mar 10, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Hicham Arazi #41 5-5 (ret.) Tommy Haas #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —