H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 4-1

Tommy Haas holds a 4–1 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2014 Rome Masters third round 7-6(6) 6-1.

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
NED Age 38 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 2014* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tommy Haas #19 7-6(6) 6-1 Igor Sijsling #53 Match data
May 6, 2014* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Igor Sijsling #59 3-6 6-1 6-4 Tommy Haas #17 Match data
Mar 23, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tommy Haas #18 6-0 5-7 6-3 Igor Sijsling #74 Match data
Feb 28, 2013* Delray Beach ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #19 5-7 6-4 (ret.) Igor Sijsling #74 Match data
Jan 10, 2013* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #21 6-3 6-4 Igor Sijsling #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Igor Sijsling #854 #52 910 1,794 44 84 34.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Igor Sijsling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #302 1,491 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #525 1,464 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2010 3–3 50.0% #126 1,580 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2011 2–3 40.0% #200 1,611 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2012 8–10 44.4% #68 1,758 0 0
25 2013 15–24 38.5% #70 1,729 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2014 9–25 26.5% #84 1,632 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2015 3–10 23.1% #145 1,692 0 0
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2016 4–7 36.4% #177 1,678 0 0
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15