H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs James Blake H2H: 2-3

James Blake holds a 3–2 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2007 US Open fourth round 4-6 6-4 3-6 6-0 7-6(4).

GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 4, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Tommy Haas #10 4-6 6-4 3-6 6-0 7-6(4) James Blake #6 Match data
Nov 4, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Tommy Haas #13 6-4 6-2 James Blake #9 Match data
Mar 11, 2006* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard James Blake #14 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Tommy Haas #28 Match data
Aug 26, 2005* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard James Blake #67 1-6 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #31 Match data
Feb 23, 2002* Memphis ATP 250 QF Hard James Blake #64 6-3 6-1 Tommy Haas #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,048 345 235 59.5% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #682 1,491 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,452 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,796 0 1
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 2,000 0 8
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,911 0 10
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2008 40–20 66.7% #10 1,888 0 10
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,848 0 10
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,841 0 10
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,788 0 10
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,714 0 10
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15