H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Jan Kroslak H2H: 1-0

Tommy Haas holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Kroslak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 1997 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jan Kroslak
SVK Age 51 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #78 6-4 6-1 6-2 Jan Kroslak Match data Aug 29, 1997* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Jan Kroslak — — — 1,752 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Jan Kroslak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 1995 8–11 42.1% — 1,568 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 1996 13–17 43.3% — 1,618 0 1
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 1997 18–13 58.1% — 1,651 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 1998 9–11 45.0% — 1,712 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 1999 13–26 33.3% — 1,601 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2000 5–10 33.3% — 1,550 0 2
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2001 1–2 33.3% — 1,530 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Jan Kroslak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 4 16 75.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 35 40 75 46.7% 6 19 25 24.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 22 22 44 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Jan Kroslak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 105.9 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) 107.9 -2.69 1995 1569 121.0 — — — — +62 -74 — 40.0% -0.54 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.8 +0.61
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 104.0 +0.33 1996 1618 128.6 — — — — +14 — +9 43.2% -0.57 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.5 +0.45
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) 107.0 -0.61 1997 1652 123.1 — — — — +54 -152 — 50.6% -0.03 8–2 (80%) 6–6 (50%) 105.5 +1.83
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) 104.3 -1.10 1998 1713 142.4 — — — — +31 -206 — 44.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 -2.07
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) 108.9 +1.60 1999 1601 119.9 — — — — +82 -174 -57 37.4% -1.08 5–5 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.3 +0.88
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1550 107.6 — — — — +46 -123 — 36.1% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 +1.07
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 103.2 -2.50 2001 1530 107.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 — 0–1 — +0.31
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) 97.9 +0.64 2002 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) 102.2 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 100.3 +2.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 97.2 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) 105.4 -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) 96.4 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) 106.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) 104.9 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) 107.1 +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 96.1 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 99.8 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1753 128.2 — — — — +49 -155 -20 42.2% -0.60 26–17 (60%) 29–28 (51%) 106.4 +1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.