H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Shanghai Masters fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2012* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Tommy Haas #21 6-2 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data
Jan 21, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Tommy Haas #17 4-6 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #36 Match data
Oct 31, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #10 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #64 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Janko Tipsarevic #108 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —