H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 3-1

Tommy Haas holds a 3–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2012 Shanghai Masters third round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #21 6-2 6-1 Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data Oct 12, 2012* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #17 4-6 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #36 Match data Jan 21, 2010* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tommy Haas #10 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #64 Match data Oct 31, 2007* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Janko Tipsarevic #108 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Tommy Haas #23 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,069 248 243 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Janko Tipsarevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,553 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,544 0 0
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2008 25–22 53.2% #49 1,733 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,822 0 0
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,809 0 0
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,008 0 2
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2012 50–27 64.9% #9 1,970 0 3
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2013 19–23 45.2% #36 1,768 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,687 0 4
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,747 0 4
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,664 0 4
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Janko Tipsarevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2007 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 16 15 31 51.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2011 38 17 55 69.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 29 18 47 61.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 159 142 301 52.8% 49 61 110 44.5% 38 34 72 52.8% 2 6 8 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 484/491 of Janko Tipsarevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% 2003 3/3 6.0 1.7 54.3% 69.5% 55.6% 43.6% 40.6% 62.7% 34.5%
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% 2004 9/9 7.7 3.3 58.4% 71.0% 46.0% 53.8% 30.4% 60.8% 36.4%
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% 2005 22/22 5.7 3.1 51.9% 70.6% 51.3% 48.7% 34.1% 61.3% 34.8%
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% 2006 25/25 7.1 2.2 57.1% 75.0% 49.3% 50.8% 34.2% 64.0% 34.1%
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2007 38/38 8.0 2.7 55.2% 74.6% 47.1% 56.6% 43.5% 61.6% 32.1%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2008 44/47 9.3 2.6 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 52.5% 43.7% 64.8% 34.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 49/49 6.4 2.5 55.7% 73.8% 51.7% 57.1% 44.2% 63.9% 36.6%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2010 44/44 7.0 2.0 57.3% 72.7% 54.1% 60.0% 41.3% 64.7% 36.3%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2011 72/73 6.1 2.3 56.0% 76.7% 56.2% 61.0% 49.2% 67.6% 40.8%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2012 74/77 7.8 2.5 56.9% 75.3% 53.7% 60.1% 42.7% 66.0% 37.6%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2013 42/42 6.2 2.2 57.9% 71.8% 51.9% 64.7% 38.7% 63.3% 34.9%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2015 10/10 6.7 3.4 53.8% 71.1% 48.1% 54.1% 30.7% 60.5% 34.7%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2016 17/17 5.5 3.4 55.1% 74.4% 49.6% 60.7% 42.0% 63.5% 33.5%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% 2017 17/17 6.1 3.1 54.1% 70.6% 46.5% 48.8% 38.7% 59.6% 33.8%
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% 2019 18/18 5.3 2.8 58.7% 69.7% 48.4% 58.0% 39.6% 60.8% 38.7%
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 484/491 6.9 2.5 56.2% 73.9% 51.9% 57.6% 41.9% 64.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Janko Tipsarevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 2003 1565 113.0 -0.22 +0.55 0.924 48.2% +9 — — 28.6% -1.28 — 1–1 — -0.28
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2004 1554 115.3 -1.04 -1.30 0.929 48.4% -23 — — 30.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.51
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2005 1545 121.5 -1.24 -1.36 0.900 48.0% -6 +49 +94 35.0% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.44
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2006 1557 119.7 +1.24 -1.88 0.947 48.5% +8 -55 +107 38.2% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.13
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2007 1735 133.6 -0.76 -2.94 0.836 46.9% -60 -192 +8 46.9% -0.29 8–5 (62%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.63
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2008 1734 143.1 +1.16 -1.11 0.978 49.7% -22 -145 +100 55.6% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 17–14 (55%) — +1.14
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1822 147.5 +0.76 +0.05 1.011 50.4% -6 -158 +1 54.8% +0.23 4–9 (31%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.85
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2010 1809 151.3 +1.01 +0.14 1.028 50.6% +32 — -18 53.3% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.29
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2011 2008 161.8 +4.65 +3.68 1.259 53.8% +27 -302 -174 67.9% +1.30 9–9 (50%) 17–15 (53%) — +2.83
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2012 1971 166.2 +3.35 +1.51 1.105 51.6% -5 +2 -70 63.4% +0.64 13–10 (57%) 22–12 (65%) — +3.81
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2013 1768 146.7 +0.25 -1.48 0.952 49.4% +60 +92 — 45.7% -0.06 8–4 (67%) 5–13 (28%) — +2.99
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2015 1688 112.4 -1.37 -1.80 0.879 47.3% — +95 — 33.3% -1.15 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.32
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2016 1748 142.6 -0.09 -0.68 0.919 48.7% +53 — +20 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.57
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 2017 1664 126.4 -2.04 -2.13 0.837 47.1% +89 +27 +28 35.9% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.12
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 2019 1665 130.0 -2.14 +0.50 0.985 50.2% +38 +16 +26 45.8% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.05
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 2069 152.5 +1.24 +0.04 1.011 50.2% +11 -51 -1 52.0% +0.13 70–71 (50%) 118–120 (50%) 101.9 +1.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.