H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-1

Tommy Haas holds a 2–1 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tommy Haas leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2000 Auckland third round 7-5 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 2000* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #11 7-5 4-6 7-5 Jeff Tarango #63 Match data
Feb 28, 1998* Philadelphia ATP 250 QF Hard Tommy Haas #43 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #61 Match data
Jun 13, 1997* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Jeff Tarango #73 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15 — — — — — — —