H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Tommy Haas vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 2-2
Tommy Haas and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Tommy Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2015 Vienna third round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 48
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| May 4, 2012* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tommy Haas | 6-1 6-4 | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
| Jan 24, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-4 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Tommy Haas | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2009* | Halle | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Tommy Haas | 6-3 7-6(3) | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Haas | #616 | #2 | 3,030 | 2,103 | 533 | 330 | 61.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tommy Haas | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #170 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #45 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #34 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,009 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2004 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2005 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,766 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2006 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2007 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2008 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2009 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #372 | 1,844 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | 2011 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #205 | 1,762 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | 2012 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #21 | 1,966 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 35 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,011 | 0 | 15 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| 36 | 2014 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #77 | 1,904 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| 37 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #470 | 1,784 | 0 | 15 | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |
| 39 | 2017 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #252 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |