H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Tommy Haas vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-2

Tommy Haas and Juan Ignacio Chela are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Haas won the 2011 Vienna Open first round 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tommy Haas #273 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5) Juan Ignacio Chela #29 Match data Oct 27, 2011* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Juan Ignacio Chela #23 6-4 1-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #145 Match data Apr 22, 2004* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Ignacio Chela #34 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #882 Match data Mar 13, 2004* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tommy Haas #7 7-5 6-1 Juan Ignacio Chela #26 Match data May 9, 2002* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,116 540 333 61.9% 0 1 0 4 10 15
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,908 307 270 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tommy Haas Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,722 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,820 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #63 1,558 0 1
21 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,833 0 1 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,601 0 1
22 2000 32–21 60.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,782 0 2
23 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,011 0 5 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,863 0 5 2004 33–26 55.9% #26 1,718 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,690 0 3
26 2004 36–19 65.5% #17 1,916 0 7 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,722 0 3
27 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,767 0 7 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,795 0 4
28 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,892 0 10 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,894 0 11 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,857 0 11 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,837 0 6
31 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,940 0 12 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,865 0 12 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,633 0 6
33 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,771 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,975 0 13 — — — — — — —
35 2013 47–24 66.2% #12 2,024 0 15 — — — — — — —
36 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,911 0 15 — — — — — — —
37 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,788 0 15 — — — — — — —
39 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,689 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tommy Haas Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 10 8 18 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 18 15 33 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1999 25 12 37 67.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 18 9 27 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2002 24 14 38 63.2% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2001 41 12 53 77.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2002 25 14 39 64.1% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 14 34 58.8% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2004 24 11 35 68.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2005 15 12 27 55.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2006 34 10 44 77.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2007 31 13 44 70.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — —
30 2008 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2009 15 14 29 51.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2010 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2011 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 16 12 28 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 28 15 43 65.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 7 6 13 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 335 197 532 63.0% 117 82 199 58.8% 57 34 91 62.6% 31 20 51 60.8% — 122 120 242 50.4% 179 131 310 57.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 8 10 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 805/873 of Tommy Haas's and 447/453 of Juan Ignacio Chela's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tommy Haas Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1996 7/7 3.7 3.9 53.5% 70.9% 59.6% 71.3% 67.6% 65.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 36/39 5.5 3.8 59.8% 71.0% 49.5% 55.1% 44.9% 62.5% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 51/60 4.9 4.1 58.9% 71.1% 48.0% 55.1% 44.2% 61.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 54/68 8.4 5.6 53.0% 76.3% 50.6% 62.2% 43.2% 64.2% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 39/53 7.0 4.4 54.3% 74.2% 51.0% 59.5% 43.0% 63.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2001 62/74 7.7 3.9 56.4% 76.7% 52.4% 64.4% 42.5% 66.0% 39.7% 2003 58/62 4.0 4.4 58.8% 69.7% 47.9% 54.8% 45.2% 60.5% 40.8%
24 2002 58/65 8.8 4.8 56.0% 75.4% 52.7% 61.9% 39.6% 65.5% 37.1% 2004 58/59 2.8 2.4 65.3% 66.8% 49.9% 53.6% 46.0% 60.9% 42.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 54/54 3.1 2.5 62.6% 68.2% 50.1% 56.5% 43.2% 61.3% 39.8%
26 2004 53/55 5.9 3.4 57.9% 75.9% 52.0% 57.3% 46.4% 65.7% 39.2% 2006 53/53 2.6 1.9 60.4% 69.2% 52.7% 63.5% 44.0% 62.5% 39.4%
27 2005 49/49 6.7 3.6 57.8% 74.3% 52.7% 52.9% 43.6% 65.2% 37.8% 2007 62/62 2.8 3.4 58.0% 69.7% 51.5% 54.4% 43.9% 62.2% 40.8%
28 2006 67/67 7.1 3.2 61.0% 76.4% 54.5% 60.1% 40.2% 67.9% 38.3% 2008 23/23 1.6 4.0 58.1% 62.8% 49.0% 56.5% 48.6% 56.9% 38.6%
29 2007 52/53 8.0 3.0 60.6% 78.1% 55.6% 61.9% 43.3% 69.0% 38.7% 2009 23/23 1.8 3.1 61.8% 66.1% 45.1% 61.1% 39.4% 58.1% 40.6%
30 2008 32/33 7.3 3.8 59.4% 72.6% 52.0% 62.8% 40.9% 64.3% 38.1% 2010 51/52 1.9 2.0 61.6% 65.8% 53.2% 54.6% 51.9% 60.9% 42.5%
31 2009 48/49 9.1 4.9 60.2% 77.6% 53.0% 65.4% 44.8% 67.7% 35.3% 2011 48/48 1.9 2.4 65.4% 65.6% 50.5% 58.7% 47.1% 60.3% 41.6%
32 2010 7/7 9.9 4.6 60.9% 72.3% 50.5% 65.2% 38.4% 63.4% 35.1% 2012 17/17 2.1 2.4 65.3% 61.8% 49.9% 56.0% 40.5% 57.6% 39.1%
33 2011 19/19 7.8 4.3 59.9% 70.7% 51.7% 60.5% 43.6% 62.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 47/48 6.2 3.4 59.6% 75.7% 53.9% 65.6% 43.9% 66.9% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 68/71 6.1 3.3 61.3% 74.8% 54.0% 63.0% 41.1% 66.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 25/25 4.6 2.0 63.7% 72.2% 53.8% 56.5% 49.5% 65.3% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 11/11 4.0 4.7 62.5% 70.1% 50.4% 52.3% 31.9% 62.8% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 20/20 4.8 4.1 61.9% 68.9% 54.0% 61.4% 29.9% 63.1% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 805/873 6.9 3.9 58.7% 74.7% 52.5% 60.6% 42.7% 65.5% 37.5% — 447/577 2.6 2.8 61.6% 67.4% 50.4% 56.7% 45.4% 60.7% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tommy Haas Juan Ignacio Chela
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1588 144.9 +0.04 +2.74 1.057 51.8% +30 — — 58.8% +0.77 0–1 2–0 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1723 139.6 +1.11 +0.51 1.027 50.7% -2 -80 -102 54.9% +0.37 9–8 (53%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.37 1999 1464 96.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — +0.19
20 1998 1821 150.9 +0.55 +1.94 1.010 50.5% -13 -133 -149 51.4% +0.19 10–6 (63%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.69 2000 1559 133.5 — — — — -63 +120 — 44.9% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.31
21 1999 1833 148.8 +1.86 -1.09 1.003 50.2% +21 -62 -115 60.7% +0.62 13–7 (65%) 20–19 (51%) — +0.33 2001 1602 129.7 — — — — -95 +120 — 56.9% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.29
22 2000 1814 145.1 +1.31 -0.68 0.983 49.9% +30 -33 -96 53.0% +0.31 14–3 (82%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.61 2002 1783 151.5 — — — — -32 +59 — 56.5% +0.48 18–8 (69%) 18–14 (56%) — -1.32
23 2001 2012 160.6 +4.03 +2.88 1.170 52.7% +26 -246 -364 67.6% +1.30 17–3 (85%) 13–18 (42%) — -1.10 2003 1762 142.3 -1.02 +3.12 1.035 50.6% -22 +63 — 54.2% +0.28 11–8 (58%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.30
24 2002 1863 149.4 +3.04 +0.31 1.074 51.4% +35 +17 — 62.0% +0.66 19–7 (73%) 17–11 (61%) — +1.60 2004 1718 148.1 -1.13 +4.91 1.089 51.6% -9 +123 — 53.9% +0.42 11–10 (52%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.39
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1691 142.8 -0.78 +2.25 1.029 50.3% +64 +15 — 51.9% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.41
26 2004 1917 153.9 +3.05 +2.94 1.143 52.4% +36 -67 -248 60.3% +0.68 10–5 (67%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.50 2006 1723 142.8 +0.65 +1.91 1.053 50.9% +36 +10 — 50.4% -0.03 6–11 (35%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.31
27 2005 1767 138.3 +1.76 +0.90 1.088 51.1% +34 +44 -63 58.6% +0.48 4–8 (33%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.64 2007 1796 148.8 -0.41 +3.45 1.078 51.3% +38 +27 -340 56.3% +0.40 15–5 (75%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.42
28 2006 1892 153.4 +4.99 +1.83 1.194 52.7% +57 -145 -124 69.5% +1.12 13–8 (62%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.81 2008 1738 127.4 -3.84 +1.12 0.895 47.8% +27 +71 — 41.1% -0.75 6–2 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.48
29 2007 1894 152.7 +4.56 +2.83 1.249 53.6% +31 -196 -35 65.2% +1.02 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +2.11 2009 1732 139.8 -3.44 +1.91 0.970 49.2% -13 +55 — 43.1% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.53
30 2008 1858 140.5 +1.47 +1.79 1.068 51.1% +30 — +20 54.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.96 2010 1838 147.5 -1.66 +4.86 1.088 51.7% -116 +93 — 51.2% +0.38 9–7 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.78
31 2009 1941 151.0 +3.54 -0.13 1.093 51.7% -108 -141 +173 61.2% +0.76 10–6 (63%) 15–13 (54%) — -1.53 2011 1738 144.8 -2.16 +3.38 1.047 50.9% -88 +162 — 50.0% +0.18 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) — +2.14
32 2010 1866 115.9 -0.81 -0.45 0.960 49.6% -85 — — 45.5% -0.05 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.43 2012 1634 126.2 -2.43 +0.71 0.923 48.4% +23 +118 — 42.9% -0.67 1–8 (11%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.58
33 2011 1772 128.1 -0.01 -0.99 0.941 48.9% +11 — +215 45.1% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1975 163.7 +4.25 +2.56 1.182 52.7% -70 -48 +106 61.9% +0.71 7–7 (50%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2013 2024 167.7 +3.58 +2.30 1.133 52.1% -25 +9 +118 65.3% +0.87 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2014 1911 147.8 +1.08 +0.76 1.066 51.1% +26 +47 — 58.8% +0.77 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2015 1788 121.7 -0.85 -1.47 0.835 47.3% +57 — +212 32.3% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2017 1689 129.1 -1.47 -2.29 0.859 47.7% +75 +108 +206 36.0% -0.80 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2117 158.2 +2.62 +1.22 1.087 51.5% +10 -44 +3 59.5% +0.62 170–105 (62%) 198–152 (57%) 109.2 -0.69 — 1909 149.6 -1.24 +3.12 1.040 50.7% -9 +79 -340 51.6% +0.16 107–94 (53%) 92–103 (47%) 98.2 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.